3d logo i6
⚠️ CYBER ALERT: New Zero-Day vulnerability (CVE-2026-0421) detected in Chromium. Update browsers immediately. • 🛡️ ADVISORY: AI-Phishing campaigns mimicking corporate IT support are active.

AI LLM ReadTeaming

AI LLM Red Teaming

Securing an enterprise AI system requires moving beyond traditional firewalls. AI Red Teaming and LLM Penetration Testing are the two pillars of AI Resilience, ensuring that your models are not only secure from hackers but also safe, unbiased, and compliant with global regulations like the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF.

While traditional penetration testing checks for "broken locks" in code, AI security testing checks if the "brain" of the application can be manipulated into making catastrophic mistakes.

AI Red Teaming: The Adversarial Simulation

Adversarial Prompting

Crafting complex jailbreak prompts to bypass safety guardrails and extract restricted or harmful outputs from AI models.

Data Poisoning Detection

Identifying malicious or manipulated data injected into training sets or RAG pipelines that can bias model behavior.

Model Inversion & Extraction

Testing whether attackers can reverse engineer proprietary models or extract sensitive training data.

Bias & Safety Audits

Evaluating models for toxic outputs, hallucinations, and biases that could lead to reputational or legal risks.

Understanding LLM Attack Surface

Large Language Models (LLMs) differ significantly in how they are built, deployed, and accessed. These differences directly influence their attack surface and risk exposure. Understanding these variations is critical for designing effective AI Red Teaming strategies and adversarial simulations tailored to each model type.

Foundation / Closed-Source LLMs

Proprietary, vendor-managed models accessed via APIs with limited internal visibility.

Common Deployment Model

SaaS / API-based platforms (e.g., OpenAI, Google, Anthropic)

Primary Attack Surface

Prompts, API endpoints, output channels

Typical Security Risks

Prompt injection, data leakage, policy bypass, API abuse

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Advanced jailbreak simulation, output manipulation, sensitive data extraction

Open-Source / Self-Hosted LLMs

Models with full access to weights and architecture, deployed and managed by the organization.

Common Deployment Model

On-prem, private cloud, hybrid cloud

Primary Attack Surface

Model weights, training pipeline, inference endpoints

Typical Security Risks

Model poisoning, weight tampering, unauthorized fine-tuning, insider threats

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Training data poisoning, model integrity attacks, inference abuse

Fine-Tuned Enterprise LLMs

Base models customized using proprietary organizational data for business functions.

Common Deployment Model

Private cloud or internal platforms

Primary Attack Surface

Fine-tuning datasets, prompts, internal integrations

Typical Security Risks

Business logic abuse, data overexposure, cross-tenant leakage

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Business workflow abuse, privilege escalation, data boundary testing

RAG-Based LLM Systems

LLMs augmented with live data retrieval from internal or external knowledge bases.

Common Deployment Model

LLM + Vector DB + Document Stores

Primary Attack Surface

Vector databases, embeddings, retrieval logic

Typical Security Risks

RAG poisoning, document injection, relevance manipulation

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Vector collision attacks, unauthorized retrieval, knowledge integrity testing

Agentic & Tool-Integrated LLMs

Autonomous or semi-autonomous LLMs capable of executing tools, APIs, or workflows.

Common Deployment Model

AI agents, copilots, automation engines

Primary Attack Surface

Tool execution layer, permissions, orchestration logic

Typical Security Risks

Privilege escalation, unsafe automation, transaction abuse

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Tool misuse simulation, agent chaining attacks, blast-radius analysis

Multi-Modal LLMs

Models that process text, images, audio, or video inputs simultaneously.

Common Deployment Model

Cloud-based or enterprise AI platforms

Primary Attack Surface

Non-text input channels, modality fusion logic

Typical Security Risks

Hidden prompt injection, cross-modal data leakage

i6 Red Teaming Focus

Image/audio-based prompt injection, cross-modal attack testing

Adversarial Use Cases We Test

i6 AI Red Teaming is designed to emulate how real-world attackers, malicious insiders, and abuse-driven users attempt to exploit Large Language Models (LLMs) in production environments. Rather than limiting assessments to basic prompt testing, i6 conducts full-spectrum adversarial simulations across prompts, data pipelines, retrieval systems, APIs, agent workflows, and governance controls. Each engagement is tailored to the organization’s AI architecture, business context, and regulatory exposure, ensuring that risks are evaluated based on actual impact, not theoretical weaknesses.


Our red teaming methodology integrates globally recognized AI security frameworks such as OWASP and NIST, while leveraging i6’s proprietary attack playbooks and automation harnesses. We simulate adversarial behavior across closed-source, open-source, fine-tuned, RAG-based, and agentic LLMs, producing measurable risk metrics, reproducible attack paths, and prioritized remediation guidance. The outcome is not just vulnerability discovery, but operational readiness, audit confidence, and AI system resilience.

Adversarial Simulation Categories

Prompt Injection & Jailbreaks

Attempts to override system instructions and safety guardrails.

Attack Techniques

Role manipulation, multi-turn escalation, token smuggling, Unicode abuse

LLM Types Covered

Closed, Open, Fine-Tuned, RAG

Business Impact

Policy bypass, unsafe responses, brand damage

Sensitive Data Disclosure

Extraction of PII, credentials, source code, or training data.

Attack Techniques

Indirect prompts, inference attacks, context leakage

LLM Types Covered

All LLM types

Business Impact

Regulatory violations, IP loss, legal exposure

RAG Poisoning & Retrieval Abuse

Manipulation of knowledge sources used by the LLM.

Attack Techniques

Malicious document injection, embedding collisions, ranking abuse

LLM Types Covered

RAG-based LLMs

Business Impact

Decision corruption, misinformation, insider risk

Model Abuse & Extraction

Unauthorized learning of model behavior or logic.

Attack Techniques

Query harvesting, differential response analysis

LLM Types Covered

Closed & Open LLMs

Business Impact

Intellectual property theft, competitive risk

Training Data Poisoning

Compromise of fine-tuning or retraining datasets.

Attack Techniques

Label manipulation, backdoor triggers

LLM Types Covered

Open & Fine-Tuned LLMs

Business Impact

Persistent model compromise, hidden logic flaws

Agent & Tool Exploitation

Abuse of autonomous actions and tool execution.

Attack Techniques

Privilege escalation, unsafe chaining, API misuse

LLM Types Covered

Agentic LLMs

Business Impact

Financial fraud, system compromise

API & Rate-Limit Abuse

Overuse or manipulation of inference APIs.

Attack Techniques

Throttling bypass, cost-amplification attacks

LLM Types Covered

Closed & Enterprise LLMs

Business Impact

Service disruption, cost overruns

Bias & Ethical Manipulation

Inducing biased or unethical outputs.

Attack Techniques

Adversarial framing, contextual pressure

LLM Types Covered

All LLM types

Business Impact

Reputational damage, audit failure

Hallucination Stress Testing

Forcing confident but incorrect responses.

Attack Techniques

Ambiguous prompts, contradictory contexts

LLM Types Covered

All LLM types

Business Impact

Poor decision-making, loss of trust

Governance & Compliance Gaps

Misalignment with AI governance requirements.

Attack Techniques

Control bypass, missing audit artifacts

LLM Types Covered

Enterprise AI systems

Business Impact

Regulatory non-compliance, audit findings

```